This would indeed never be an issue with it framework; Sir John de- Keith d

Re: ? Comyn wife of Malise

Towards Comyn daughter who had been wife out-of Malise out of Strathearn, I experienced theorized during the 2005 you to she was in fact Margaret, defined as partner out of Sir John de- Keith (see content from post below) who was simply 2ndly age are provided where post: the fresh new partner Emma I recommend is of some other friends, and never mother of the second Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl of Buchan_ , states partly, ‘Malise, Earl away from Strathearn, had a partner Emma, inside the 1261-1267, whose surname was unknown ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. regarding Docs., i. 2383, 2451]. some time in advance of 1270, so that his widow (Margaret) could have been “available” a while shortly after Emma.

This is needless to say a speculation; it does have the advantage of handling a well-known relationships anywhere between Muriel Keith and you may Reginald le Cheyne. Any further related documentation create obviously getting allowed.

The fresh membership in the Scots Peerage towards category of Keith claims off Sir John de Keith (d. ca. 1270) which he try said to has hitched Comyn, earl from Buchan . So it identity, of unsure (“considered had been”) assortment, is now able to become fixed according to the following dispensation, old from the Fondi towards 14 The month of january 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 On bishop off Moray. Faculty in order to dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, out-of Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, on impediment so you can matrimony as a result of the next and you may next degrees of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step one. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the long term 2nd partner out of Robert Stewart, initial Duke from Albany (d. 1420), try contracted so you’re able to marry Reginald le Cheyne, young buck out of Sir Reginald le Cheyne by the their wife (as her first partner), Helen out of Strathearn. If you find yourself you will find notable openings regarding the ancestry off Muriel Keith, she and you can Reginald ce Cheyne carry out express an origin about Comyns. Yet not, this really is too distant to need a great dispensation in the event that Muriel is a great-great-higher grandd Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan (d. 1233), which would become instance if the ‘s child.

dos. Reginald le Cheyne is actually an effective-grandson regarding Marjory Comyn, daughter regarding Alexander Comyn, Earl from Buchan (d. 1290), child out of William Comyn mentioned above. Her son try Malise, Earl away from Strathearn regarding 1312 to their dying into the 1328 , and you will daddy out-of Reginald.

ca. 1270), is just like Marjory Comyn, and hitched 2ndly to Malise, Earl of Strathearn (d. 1312). This should imply the fresh parentage a€?considered possess been’ that Margaret, spouse from Sir John de Keith, is of that age group: she would n’t have already been this new d Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan, kissbrides.com top article but rather from their son Alexander. There’s no evidence one to Earl Malise and you may Marjory Comyn have been married much before 1275: since the Lindsay authored,

There clearly was you to definitely discernable base on what the connection ranging from Reginald ce Cheyne and Muriel Keith could have lived: if the Margaret Comyn, partner from Sir John de Keith (d

‘ The new wife on the earl, throughout the 1275, was titled Marjory, as we understand the attesting condition of No. curriculum vitae., which can be said by the Wyntoun, Guide VIII. man. vi., to possess started the following sister out of John Comyn, Earl from Buchan, exactly who discussed on the behalf of Earl Malise the marriage payment a lot more than stated [old at the London area, April twenty-six, 1293 to own their child Matilda and Robert de- Tony, young man out of Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = Age de Quincy Elizabeth from Buchan I __________________I________________ I III 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith I (als I Elizabeth off Strathearn . 1270 We Margaret) I d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ We We We I We I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de Keith de Keith E out-of = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony I ______I_______________________ I We I I Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de E off Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 I ce Cheyne We We We = 2) Sir David We V I We de- Graham Sir William de- We I__________ Keith We I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We I We III We We We I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith le Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke away from Albany)